Nashua UU Church: Teaching Parish Committee

Annual report for church year ending June 12, 2003

 

Our support for the larger UU movement by providing the opportunity for a new UU minister to gain experience leading services and working with a UU congregation on a day to day basis is an honor and privilege. By now almost all of you have met Jackie Clement and have heard her sermons, readings, and her leading of joys and concerns. It has been a joy working with Jackie and we all look forward to next year!

 

What follows is the body of our report to the UUA and Andover Newton in May 2004.

 

Overview

Jackie Clement is a wonderful UU minister. She will bring meaning, comfort and happiness to every UU congregation she leads.

 

It is a joy to work with Jackie on the TPC, we observe many golden qualities: Jackie is centered, comfortable in her own skin, has a delightful sense of humor, responds well to criticism, is a good listener and responds thoughtfully and with compassion to all. The view from the pew is of a warm person who delivers a sermon, or a service for that matter, that serves the best traditions of our UU movement. Jackie connects intellectually, emotionally and spiritually.

 

TPC Evaluation

The TPC met once a month except for February – snowed out!

 

In September 2002, the Steve Edington & the TPC negotiated a five page Learning Agreement with Jackie. The agreement touched on several areas of ministry through out the church for Jackie to experience. And, we think, represented a rather full schedule for Jackie to pursue. We had our reservations about the amount of work she was committing to with respect to the time allotted; we need not have worried. Jackie honored her commitment to the LA in full.

 

Also, we conducted four written surveys about Jackie’s work in the Sunday service, two qualitative and one quantitative. All revealed a congregation that is engaged when Jackie speaks and enthusiastic about Jackie’s style and depth of caring.

 

The first three surveys were qualitative and asked open-ended questions to solicit the widest possible range of responses. The overall reaction to both these surveys was very positive and representative comments are included below.

 

The quantitative survey asked respondents to rate various aspects of an entire service designed and delivered by Jackie. The survey was comprised of 19 statements for which a response of 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree) was requested. This survey also asked two questions – how can Jackie improve and what are Jackie’s golden qualities. The surveys were included in the Order of Service. Typical attendance on Sunday is 75 to 100; we received 74 surveys from 96 attendees! All were very positive in tone and comment!

 

Respectfully submitted,

Ruth Cannava

Doug Philbrook

Barbara Spitz

Kim Steele

Steve Ladew